DFL

Kim McLaughlin

Minnesota State Senate District 7 2026 · 2026

↗ Official Website

Policy Positions

55%

Avg Confidence

Issue Areas

Find Your Alignment →

Policy Positions

▲

Criminal Justice

1 position

Do you believe that repeat violent offenders should face longer mandatory minimum prison sentences than current law requires?

Neutral

Party InferenceCandidate's campaign website contains no statements on criminal justice, mandatory minimums, or sentencing policy; DFL party baseline suggests moderate support for criminal justice reform, but no direct evidence of this candidate's position exists. Fact-check this →

◊

Drug Policy

1 position

Do you believe local governments should have the authority to prohibit cannabis retail businesses from operating within their jurisdictions?

Neutral

Party InferenceCandidate's campaign website is silent on cannabis policy, local control of retail businesses, or drug policy generally; position inferred from DFL party baseline which typically supports local control on cannabis but without strong activist stance. Fact-check this →

■

Education

1 position

Would you support creating education savings accounts that give families the option to apply their share of state school funding toward tuition at a private school?

Oppose

Party InferenceCandidate's campaign platform emphasizes strong public education funding, union support, and ensuring schools are 'fully funded,' with no mention of education savings accounts or private school choice mechanisms, combined with DFL party baseline opposition to such policies. Fact-check this →

◆

Environment

1 position

Do you believe Minnesota should keep its current law requiring all electricity delivered by utilities to come from carbon-free sources by 2040?

Support

Party InferenceCampaign platform emphasizes public service, accountability, and labor/union support consistent with DFL environmental values, but contains no explicit statement on the 2040 carbon-free electricity standard; position inferred from party alignment and pro-labor/pro-public-interest stance. Fact-check this →

□

Gun Policy

1 position

Do you believe courts should have the authority to temporarily remove firearms from people determined by a judge to be a danger to themselves or others?

Support

Party InferenceNo direct statement on extreme risk protection orders found in campaign materials; position inferred from DFL party baseline support for gun safety measures and candidate's stated commitment to public safety and evidence-based policy. Fact-check this →

♥

Healthcare

1 position

Do you believe residents should have the option to purchase health coverage directly through a state-run insurance program if they choose?

Support

Party InferenceCampaign platform emphasizes 'advocating for affordable healthcare' as a priority, and DFL party baseline strongly supports public option/state-run insurance programs, but candidate's website contains no explicit statement on state-run health insurance plans specifically. Fact-check this →

▪

Housing

1 position

Would you support requiring cities to allow more than one housing unit on lots where only single-family homes are currently permitted by zoning rules?

Neutral

Party InferenceCandidate's campaign website emphasizes affordable housing access and community development but contains no specific statements on zoning reform, single-family zoning, or multifamily housing density requirements; position inferred from DFL party baseline support for housing density policies. Fact-check this →

▶

Immigration

1 position

Would you support a policy that allows residents to obtain a driver's license regardless of their immigration status?

Neutral

Party InferenceCandidate's campaign website contains no statements addressing immigration policy or driver's license access; position inferred from DFL party baseline on immigration issues, which typically supports more inclusive policies, but without direct candidate evidence. Fact-check this →

△

Infrastructure

1 position

Would you support a policy that dedicates metro-area sales tax revenue specifically to funding public transit expansion and operations?

Neutral

Party InferenceCampaign platform emphasizes infrastructure needs for the Iron Range region and public transit generally, but contains no explicit statement on metro-area sales tax dedication for transit; position inferred from DFL party baseline support for public transit funding mechanisms. Fact-check this →

⚐

Labor

1 position

Would you support continuing a state-run paid leave program that allows workers to receive benefits funded by employer and employee payroll taxes?

Support

Campaign PlatformCampaign platform emphasizes union advocacy (18-year MAPE member), support for worker protections, and 'strong unions are the backbone of a vibrant economy,' which aligns with support for employer-employee funded paid leave, though the candidate has not explicitly championed this specific policy. Fact-check this →

◈

Social Security

1 position

Would you support a policy that fully exempts all Social Security benefits from Minnesota state income tax, regardless of how much income a recipient earns?

Neutral

Party InferenceNo direct statement on Social Security tax exemption policy found in candidate's campaign website; position inferred from DFL party baseline support for senior tax relief and her stated commitment to 'affordable healthcare' and helping seniors 'age with dignity,' but without explicit endorsement of full exemption regardless of income level. Fact-check this →

⚑

Taxes

1 position

Do you believe the state should establish an additional income tax bracket with a higher rate for income earned above one million dollars per year?

Support

Party InferenceCandidate's campaign platform emphasizes fiscal responsibility, accountability, and 'working for' families and affordable living; DFL party baseline strongly supports progressive taxation including millionaire tax brackets; no direct statement on this specific policy found on candidate website. Fact-check this →