Republican

Andrea Zupancich

Minnesota State Senate District 3 2026 · 2026

↗ Official Website

Policy Positions

52%

Avg Confidence

Issue Areas

Find Your Alignment →

Policy Positions

▲

Criminal Justice

1 position

Do you believe that repeat violent offenders should face longer mandatory minimum prison sentences than current law requires?

Support

Party InferenceNo direct candidate statements or voting record available on this specific issue; position inferred from Republican party baseline on criminal justice and mandatory sentencing, which typically supports stricter penalties for violent repeat offenders. Fact-check this →

◊

Drug Policy

1 position

Do you believe local governments should have the authority to prohibit cannabis retail businesses from operating within their jurisdictions?

Support

Party InferenceNo direct evidence on cannabis local control found; inferred from Republican party baseline which generally supports local authority and opposes cannabis legalization, though confidence is limited by absence of candidate-specific statements or record. Fact-check this →

■

Education

1 position

Would you support creating education savings accounts that give families the option to apply their share of state school funding toward tuition at a private school?

Support

Party InferenceNo direct statements or voting record found on education savings accounts; inference based on Republican party platform support for school choice policies and educational freedom, typical of Minnesota GOP candidates. Fact-check this →

◆

Environment

1 position

Do you believe Minnesota should keep its current law requiring all electricity delivered by utilities to come from carbon-free sources by 2040?

Oppose

Party InferenceNo direct statements or voting record available on Minnesota's 2040 carbon-free electricity mandate; position inferred from Republican party baseline skepticism toward aggressive renewable energy mandates and their typical cost-benefit concerns. Fact-check this →

□

Gun Policy

1 position

Do you believe courts should have the authority to temporarily remove firearms from people determined by a judge to be a danger to themselves or others?

Oppose

Party InferenceNo direct evidence on extreme risk protection orders or firearms removal authority found; position inferred from Republican party baseline opposition to gun restriction measures. Fact-check this →

♥

Healthcare

1 position

Do you believe residents should have the option to purchase health coverage directly through a state-run insurance program if they choose?

Oppose

Party InferenceNo direct candidate statements or voting record found on state-run health insurance programs; position inferred from Republican party baseline opposition to government-run healthcare alternatives. Fact-check this →

▪

Housing

1 position

Would you support requiring cities to allow more than one housing unit on lots where only single-family homes are currently permitted by zoning rules?

Oppose

Party InferenceNo direct evidence on zoning/housing policy found; position inferred from Republican party baseline opposition to land-use mandates and local zoning restrictions. Fact-check this →

▶

Immigration

1 position

Would you support a policy that allows residents to obtain a driver's license regardless of their immigration status?

Oppose

Party InferenceNo direct evidence of Zupancich's position on driver's licenses for undocumented immigrants; assignment reflects typical Republican party opposition to such policies, with modest confidence due to lack of candidate-specific record. Fact-check this →

△

Infrastructure

1 position

Would you support a policy that dedicates metro-area sales tax revenue specifically to funding public transit expansion and operations?

Oppose

Party InferenceNo direct evidence on this specific transit-funding policy found; position inferred from Republican party baseline skepticism toward dedicated sales tax increases for public transit, typical of MN-03 district conservatism. Fact-check this →

⚐

Labor

1 position

Would you support continuing a state-run paid leave program that allows workers to receive benefits funded by employer and employee payroll taxes?

Oppose

Party InferenceNo direct evidence on paid leave policy found; position inferred from Republican party baseline opposition to employer/employee payroll tax mandates and state-run social insurance programs. Fact-check this →

◈

Social Security

1 position

Would you support a policy that fully exempts all Social Security benefits from Minnesota state income tax, regardless of how much income a recipient earns?

Support

Party InferenceNo direct evidence on this specific Social Security tax exemption policy found; position inferred from typical Republican support for tax relief on retirement income and senior-focused policies, moderated by lack of explicit championing of this particular proposal. Fact-check this →

⚑

Taxes

1 position

Do you believe the state should establish an additional income tax bracket with a higher rate for income earned above one million dollars per year?

Strongly Oppose

Party InferenceNo direct statements or voting record on millionaire tax brackets found; position inferred from Republican party baseline opposition to progressive income tax increases. Fact-check this →