DFL

Dan Wilson

Minnesota State House District 26A 2026 · 2026

Policy Positions

50%

Avg Confidence

Issue Areas

Find Your Alignment →

Policy Positions

▲

Criminal Justice

1 position

Do you believe that repeat violent offenders should face longer mandatory minimum prison sentences than current law requires?

Neutral

Party InferenceNo direct statements, voting record, or explicit policy positions found regarding mandatory minimum sentences for repeat violent offenders; position inferred from DFL party baseline on criminal justice. Fact-check this →

◊

Drug Policy

1 position

Do you believe local governments should have the authority to prohibit cannabis retail businesses from operating within their jurisdictions?

Neutral

Party InferenceNo direct evidence found regarding Dan Wilson's position on local cannabis retail prohibition authority; assignment reflects insufficient candidate-specific information on this policy question. Fact-check this →

■

Education

1 position

Would you support creating education savings accounts that give families the option to apply their share of state school funding toward tuition at a private school?

Oppose

Party InferenceNo direct evidence of Dan Wilson's position on education savings accounts located; opposition inferred from DFL party baseline opposition to education privatization policies and typical state house member voting patterns on school funding issues. Fact-check this →

◆

Environment

1 position

Do you believe Minnesota should keep its current law requiring all electricity delivered by utilities to come from carbon-free sources by 2040?

Neutral

Party InferenceNo direct evidence of Dan Wilson's position on Minnesota's 2040 carbon-free electricity mandate was found in available sources; inference is based on DFL party alignment with clean energy policies, but without candidate-specific statements or voting record on this exact issue. Fact-check this →

□

Gun Policy

1 position

Do you believe courts should have the authority to temporarily remove firearms from people determined by a judge to be a danger to themselves or others?

Support

Party InferenceNo direct candidate statements or voting record found on extreme risk protection orders specifically; position inferred from DFL party baseline support for gun safety measures and typical voting patterns of DFL House candidates in Minnesota. Fact-check this →

♥

Healthcare

1 position

Do you believe residents should have the option to purchase health coverage directly through a state-run insurance program if they choose?

Support

Party InferenceDFL party affiliation and healthcare policy alignment suggest support for public option/state-run insurance programs, but no direct voting record or explicit statements on this specific policy found for this state house candidate. Fact-check this →

▪

Housing

1 position

Would you support requiring cities to allow more than one housing unit on lots where only single-family homes are currently permitted by zoning rules?

Neutral

Party InferenceNo direct evidence of Dan Wilson's position on zoning reform or housing density policies could be located; assignment based on DFL party baseline support for housing affordability measures, but without candidate-specific statements or voting record. Fact-check this →

▶

Immigration

1 position

Would you support a policy that allows residents to obtain a driver's license regardless of their immigration status?

Neutral

Party InferenceNo direct evidence found regarding Dan Wilson's position on driver's licenses for undocumented immigrants; assignment reflects DFL baseline alignment with limited specific candidate documentation. Fact-check this →

△

Infrastructure

1 position

Would you support a policy that dedicates metro-area sales tax revenue specifically to funding public transit expansion and operations?

Neutral

Party InferenceNo direct evidence of Dan Wilson's position on metro-area sales tax dedication for transit; assignment reflects DFL party baseline support for transit funding with low confidence due to insufficient candidate-specific record. Fact-check this →

⚐

Labor

1 position

Would you support continuing a state-run paid leave program that allows workers to receive benefits funded by employer and employee payroll taxes?

Support

Party InferenceNo direct statements or voting record found on Minnesota's paid leave program specifically; position inferred from DFL party platform support for worker benefits and labor protections, with typical moderate-to-progressive lean for state representatives in this caucus. Fact-check this →

◈

Social Security

1 position

Would you support a policy that fully exempts all Social Security benefits from Minnesota state income tax, regardless of how much income a recipient earns?

Neutral

Party InferenceNo direct evidence found regarding Dan Wilson's position on Social Security tax exemption; assignment based on DFL party tendency to support tax relief for seniors but without candidate-specific statements or voting record on this issue. Fact-check this →

⚑

Taxes

1 position

Do you believe the state should establish an additional income tax bracket with a higher rate for income earned above one million dollars per year?

Support

Party InferenceDFL party affiliation and typical progressive tax policy alignment suggest support for millionaire tax bracket, but no direct voting record or explicit statements on this specific proposal found for this state house candidate. Fact-check this →