DFL

Reed Olson

Minnesota State House District 2A 2026 · 2026

Policy Positions

48%

Avg Confidence

Issue Areas

Find Your Alignment →

Policy Positions

▲

Criminal Justice

1 position

Do you believe that repeat violent offenders should face longer mandatory minimum prison sentences than current law requires?

Neutral

Party InferenceNo direct voting record, public statements, or campaign materials available regarding mandatory minimum sentences for repeat violent offenders; position inferred from DFL party baseline on criminal justice. Fact-check this →

◊

Drug Policy

1 position

Do you believe local governments should have the authority to prohibit cannabis retail businesses from operating within their jurisdictions?

Neutral

Party InferenceNo direct evidence found regarding Reed Olson's position on local cannabis retail authority; assignment based on DFL party baseline support for cannabis legalization with local control provisions, but insufficient candidate-specific record to determine stance on local prohibition authority. Fact-check this →

■

Education

1 position

Would you support creating education savings accounts that give families the option to apply their share of state school funding toward tuition at a private school?

Oppose

Party InferenceNo direct statements or voting record found on education savings accounts; position inferred from DFL party baseline opposition to education privatization policies and typical party platform on public school funding. Fact-check this →

◆

Environment

1 position

Do you believe Minnesota should keep its current law requiring all electricity delivered by utilities to come from carbon-free sources by 2040?

Neutral

Party InferenceNo direct evidence found regarding Reed Olson's position on Minnesota's 2040 carbon-free electricity requirement; assignment based on DFL party baseline for environmental policy support, but insufficient candidate-specific record to determine conviction level or any reservations. Fact-check this →

□

Gun Policy

1 position

Do you believe courts should have the authority to temporarily remove firearms from people determined by a judge to be a danger to themselves or others?

Support

Party InferenceNo direct voting record or explicit statement found on extreme risk protection orders; position inferred from DFL party baseline support for gun safety measures and lack of opposing rhetoric. Fact-check this →

♥

Healthcare

1 position

Do you believe residents should have the option to purchase health coverage directly through a state-run insurance program if they choose?

Neutral

Party InferenceNo direct statements, voting record, or campaign materials found specifically addressing state-run health insurance options for Reed Olson in Minnesota House District 2A. Fact-check this →

▪

Housing

1 position

Would you support requiring cities to allow more than one housing unit on lots where only single-family homes are currently permitted by zoning rules?

Neutral

Party InferenceNo direct evidence of Reed Olson's position on zoning reform or housing density requirements; assignment reflects party baseline for DFL candidate without specific record or statements on this issue. Fact-check this →

▶

Immigration

1 position

Would you support a policy that allows residents to obtain a driver's license regardless of their immigration status?

Neutral

Party InferenceInsufficient direct evidence on this specific policy question for Reed Olson; assignment reflects DFL baseline position on immigrant access policies pending direct candidate statements or voting record. Fact-check this →

△

Infrastructure

1 position

Would you support a policy that dedicates metro-area sales tax revenue specifically to funding public transit expansion and operations?

Neutral

Party InferenceNo direct evidence found regarding Reed Olson's position on metro-area sales tax dedication for transit; assignment based on DFL party baseline support for public transit infrastructure without candidate-specific statements or voting record. Fact-check this →

⚐

Labor

1 position

Would you support continuing a state-run paid leave program that allows workers to receive benefits funded by employer and employee payroll taxes?

Neutral

Party InferenceNo direct evidence found regarding Reed Olson's position on Minnesota's paid leave program; assignment reflects DFL party baseline support for labor protections absent candidate-specific statements or voting record. Fact-check this →

◈

Social Security

1 position

Would you support a policy that fully exempts all Social Security benefits from Minnesota state income tax, regardless of how much income a recipient earns?

Neutral

Party InferenceNo direct evidence found regarding Reed Olson's position on Social Security tax exemptions; assignment based on DFL party baseline support for senior benefits combined with insufficient specific candidate record. Fact-check this →

⚑

Taxes

1 position

Do you believe the state should establish an additional income tax bracket with a higher rate for income earned above one million dollars per year?

Support

Party InferenceDFL party affiliation and general progressive tax stance inferred from party platform; no direct voting record or explicit statement on millionaire tax bracket found for this state house candidate. Fact-check this →