Republican

Sue Ek

Minnesota State House District 14B 2026 · 2026

Policy Positions

46%

Avg Confidence

Issue Areas

Find Your Alignment →

Policy Positions

▲

Criminal Justice

1 position

Do you believe that repeat violent offenders should face longer mandatory minimum prison sentences than current law requires?

Neutral

Party InferenceNo direct evidence found regarding Sue Ek's specific position on mandatory minimum sentences for repeat violent offenders; assessment based on limited publicly available information for this Minnesota State House candidate. Fact-check this →

◊

Drug Policy

1 position

Do you believe local governments should have the authority to prohibit cannabis retail businesses from operating within their jurisdictions?

Neutral

Party InferenceNo direct evidence found regarding Sue Ek's position on local cannabis retail prohibition authority; assignment based on insufficient candidate-specific information. Fact-check this →

■

Education

1 position

Would you support creating education savings accounts that give families the option to apply their share of state school funding toward tuition at a private school?

Neutral

Party InferenceNo direct statements, voting record, or campaign materials on education savings accounts (ESAs) could be located for Sue Ek; position inferred from general Republican party baseline support for school choice policies, but without candidate-specific evidence. Fact-check this →

◆

Environment

1 position

Do you believe Minnesota should keep its current law requiring all electricity delivered by utilities to come from carbon-free sources by 2040?

Neutral

Party InferenceNo direct evidence of Sue Ek's position on Minnesota's 2040 carbon-free electricity standard; assignment reflects insufficient candidate-specific information rather than a demonstrated neutral stance. Fact-check this →

□

Gun Policy

1 position

Do you believe courts should have the authority to temporarily remove firearms from people determined by a judge to be a danger to themselves or others?

Neutral

Party InferenceNo direct evidence of Sue Ek's position on extreme risk protection orders or firearm removal authority; assignment based on insufficient candidate-specific information. Fact-check this →

♥

Healthcare

1 position

Do you believe residents should have the option to purchase health coverage directly through a state-run insurance program if they choose?

Oppose

Party InferenceNo direct public statements or voting record found on state-run health insurance programs; position inferred from Republican party baseline opposition to government-run healthcare alternatives. Fact-check this →

▪

Housing

1 position

Would you support requiring cities to allow more than one housing unit on lots where only single-family homes are currently permitted by zoning rules?

Neutral

Party InferenceNo direct evidence of Sue Ek's position on zoning reform or housing density policies was found; assignment reflects genuine lack of information rather than an inferred moderate stance. Fact-check this →

▶

Immigration

1 position

Would you support a policy that allows residents to obtain a driver's license regardless of their immigration status?

Neutral

Party InferenceNo direct evidence found regarding Sue Ek's position on driver's licenses for undocumented immigrants; assignment reflects insufficient information rather than demonstrated neutrality. Fact-check this →

△

Infrastructure

1 position

Would you support a policy that dedicates metro-area sales tax revenue specifically to funding public transit expansion and operations?

Neutral

Party InferenceNo direct evidence of Sue Ek's position on metro-area sales tax dedication for transit; assignment reflects insufficient candidate-specific information on this policy question. Fact-check this →

⚐

Labor

1 position

Would you support continuing a state-run paid leave program that allows workers to receive benefits funded by employer and employee payroll taxes?

Neutral

Party InferenceNo direct evidence found regarding Sue Ek's position on Minnesota's paid leave program; assignment based on insufficient candidate-specific information. Fact-check this →

◈

Social Security

1 position

Would you support a policy that fully exempts all Social Security benefits from Minnesota state income tax, regardless of how much income a recipient earns?

Neutral

Party InferenceNo direct evidence found regarding Sue Ek's position on Social Security tax exemptions; assignment reflects insufficient information rather than confirmed neutral stance. Fact-check this →

⚑

Taxes

1 position

Do you believe the state should establish an additional income tax bracket with a higher rate for income earned above one million dollars per year?

Oppose

Party InferenceNo direct statements or voting record found on millionaire tax brackets; position inferred from Republican party baseline opposition to progressive taxation and DW-NOMINATE ideological calibration. Fact-check this →