RepublicanINCUMBENT

Warren Limmer

Minnesota State Senate District 37 2026 · 2026

Policy Positions

54%

Avg Confidence

Issue Areas

Find Your Alignment →

Policy Positions

▲

Criminal Justice

1 position

Do you believe that repeat violent offenders should face longer mandatory minimum prison sentences than current law requires?

Support

Party InferenceNo direct voting record or explicit statements on mandatory minimums for repeat violent offenders found; position inferred from Republican party baseline support for stricter criminal justice measures, with modest confidence reflecting lack of candidate-specific evidence. Fact-check this →

◊

Drug Policy

1 position

Do you believe local governments should have the authority to prohibit cannabis retail businesses from operating within their jurisdictions?

Support

Party InferenceNo direct evidence found on this specific cannabis local-control issue; position inferred from Republican party baseline favoring local government authority and typical conservative skepticism of cannabis retail expansion. Fact-check this →

■

Education

1 position

Would you support creating education savings accounts that give families the option to apply their share of state school funding toward tuition at a private school?

Support

Party InferenceRepublican state senator from Minnesota with typical conservative education policy orientation favoring school choice and reduced government education monopoly; no direct statement on education savings accounts specifically located, so position inferred from party baseline and general conservative education philosophy. Fact-check this →

◆

Environment

1 position

Do you believe Minnesota should keep its current law requiring all electricity delivered by utilities to come from carbon-free sources by 2040?

Oppose

Party InferenceNo direct evidence of Limmer's position on Minnesota's 2040 carbon-free electricity mandate located; position inferred from Republican party baseline opposition to aggressive climate/renewable mandates, tempered by lack of evidence of active campaigning against the specific policy. Fact-check this →

□

Gun Policy

1 position

Do you believe courts should have the authority to temporarily remove firearms from people determined by a judge to be a danger to themselves or others?

Oppose

Party InferenceNo direct evidence on extreme risk protection orders found; position inferred from Republican party baseline opposition to gun restrictions, with modest confidence adjustment given lack of explicit record. Fact-check this →

♥

Healthcare

1 position

Do you believe residents should have the option to purchase health coverage directly through a state-run insurance program if they choose?

Oppose

Party InferenceNo direct public statements or voting record found on state-run health insurance programs; position inferred from Republican party baseline opposition to government-run healthcare alternatives. Fact-check this →

▪

Housing

1 position

Would you support requiring cities to allow more than one housing unit on lots where only single-family homes are currently permitted by zoning rules?

Oppose

Party InferenceNo direct evidence on zoning/housing density policy found; position inferred from typical Republican skepticism toward land-use mandates on local municipalities. Fact-check this →

▶

Immigration

1 position

Would you support a policy that allows residents to obtain a driver's license regardless of their immigration status?

Oppose

Party InferenceNo direct public statements or voting record on driver's licenses for undocumented immigrants located; position inferred from Republican party baseline opposition to policies facilitating illegal immigration status. Fact-check this →

△

Infrastructure

1 position

Would you support a policy that dedicates metro-area sales tax revenue specifically to funding public transit expansion and operations?

Oppose

Party InferenceNo direct evidence on this specific metro sales tax transit funding question; position inferred from typical Republican skepticism toward dedicated sales taxes and transit expansion funding, aligned with conservative fiscal policy baseline. Fact-check this →

⚐

Labor

1 position

Would you support continuing a state-run paid leave program that allows workers to receive benefits funded by employer and employee payroll taxes?

Oppose

Party InferenceNo direct evidence on Minnesota's paid leave program found; position inferred from Republican party baseline opposition to employer/employee payroll tax mandates for social programs. Fact-check this →

◈

Social Security

1 position

Would you support a policy that fully exempts all Social Security benefits from Minnesota state income tax, regardless of how much income a recipient earns?

Support

Party InferenceNo direct evidence on this specific Social Security tax exemption policy found; position inferred from Republican party baseline support for reducing tax burden on seniors and Social Security recipients, typical of Minnesota GOP legislators. Fact-check this →

⚑

Taxes

1 position

Do you believe the state should establish an additional income tax bracket with a higher rate for income earned above one million dollars per year?

Strongly Oppose

Party InferenceNo direct statements or voting record found on this specific tax policy; position inferred from Republican party baseline opposition to progressive income tax structures and Limmer's general conservative fiscal record in Minnesota State Senate. Fact-check this →