●
Economy
2 positions · all inferred from partyWould you support raising the federal minimum wage to $17 per hour?
Inferred from partyPratt's campaign platform emphasizes pro-growth, market-driven economic policies, opposition to government expansion, and endorsements from NFIB (which consistently opposes minimum wage increases), suggesting opposition to a $17 federal minimum wage, though he makes no direct statement on the issue; inferred from party affiliation and platform stance. Fact-check this → Would you support imposing tariffs of 25% or more on imports from countries that do not meet US labor and environmental standards?
Inferred from partyPratt's campaign platform supports 'fair trade' and domestic energy/jobs but does not specifically address tariffs tied to labor or environmental standards; inference leans slightly toward support given Republican alignment with tariff-friendly trade policy under Trump, but no direct evidence exists, so party inference at moderate confidence applies. Fact-check this → ■
Education
1 position · all inferred from partyWould you support canceling up to $50,000 in federal student loan debt per borrower?
Strongly Oppose · estimate Inferred from partyNo direct statement on student loan cancellation found in campaign materials; as a Republican emphasizing fiscal accountability, fraud prevention, and opposition to expansive government spending programs, party-based inference strongly suggests opposition to broad federal student loan cancellation.
◆
Environment
2 positions · 1 inferred from partyDo you support stopping the issuance of new federal permits for oil and gas drilling on public lands and offshore waters?
Campaign PlatformPratt's campaign platform explicitly supports expanding domestic energy production and affordability through reliable energy supply, strongly implying opposition to halting new federal oil and gas permits; this is reinforced by standard Republican Party positioning on the issue. Fact-check this → Do you support legislation to reduce US carbon emissions by 50% from 2005 levels by 2035?
Strongly Oppose · estimate Inferred from partyPratt's campaign platform emphasizes 'reliable and affordable domestic energy' and a 'pro-growth economy' without any mention of carbon reduction targets; his Republican affiliation and pro-fossil-fuel framing strongly suggest opposition to aggressive emissions mandates like a 50% cut by 2035. Fact-check this → ▽
Foreign Policy
2 positions · all inferred from partyWould you support increasing the federal defense budget by more than 5% per year above the rate of inflation?
Inferred from partyPratt's campaign platform does not address defense spending levels specifically; as a Republican candidate emphasizing national security and a strong economy, party-based inference suggests support for increased defense spending, though no direct statement confirms support for the specific 5%-above-inflation threshold.
Would you support maintaining or increasing current levels of US foreign assistance to allied and developing nations?
Inferred from partyPratt's campaign website does not address foreign assistance, so position is inferred from Republican Party norms, which generally lean toward reducing or conditioning foreign aid, especially under the current America-first orientation of the party.
□
Gun Policy
2 positions · all inferred from partyWould you support requiring background checks for all firearm purchases in the US, including private sales and gun show transactions?
Inferred from partyThe campaign website does not address universal background checks; as a Republican candidate with ties to gun-rights positions, party-based inference suggests opposition, with confidence reduced due to absence of direct evidence.
Would you support a federal ban on the manufacture and sale of semi-automatic rifles with detachable magazines to civilian buyers?
Strongly Oppose · estimate Inferred from partyThe campaign website does not address semi-automatic rifle bans specifically, so position is inferred from Republican Party norms and Pratt's general pro-gun, pro-Second Amendment alignment typical of conservative Republican candidates.
♥
Healthcare
2 positions · 1 inferred from partyWould you support expanding Medicare to cover all Americans regardless of age?
Campaign PlatformPratt's campaign platform explicitly opposes replacing private and employer-sponsored coverage with 'a single government-run healthcare system,' which directly contradicts Medicare for All/expanded Medicare proposals, and as a Republican candidate he aligns with strong party opposition to such expansion. Fact-check this → Would you support federal legislation requiring Medicare to negotiate prescription drug prices directly with pharmaceutical manufacturers?
Inferred from partyPratt's campaign platform emphasizes increasing competition, transparency, and addressing PBMs to lower drug costs rather than direct government price negotiation, consistent with typical Republican opposition to Medicare drug price negotiation; no direct statement on this specific policy was found. Fact-check this → ▶
Immigration
2 positions · all inferred from partyWould you support a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants who have lived and worked continuously in the US for more than 5 years?
Inferred from partyThe campaign website does not address a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants; position is inferred from Republican Party norms, which generally oppose amnesty or legalization pathways, with Pratt's platform emphasizing program integrity and accountability consistent with that lean.
Would you support significantly increasing federal funding for border security infrastructure and personnel at the US southern border?
Inferred from partyThe campaign website does not explicitly address southern border security funding, so this score is inferred from Pratt's Republican Party affiliation and general law-and-order/accountability framing on his platform, with no direct statement to raise confidence higher. Fact-check this → ⚑
Taxes
2 positions · all inferred from partyWould you support raising the top federal income tax rate to 50% for individual income exceeding $10 million per year?
Strongly Oppose · estimate Inferred from partyPratt's campaign platform emphasizes pro-growth economics, opposing government expansion, and supporting tax relief, which strongly implies opposition to a 50% top marginal rate; no direct statement on this specific policy exists, so this is primarily a party-based inference consistent with his Republican platform. Fact-check this → Would you support raising the federal corporate income tax rate from 21% to 28%?
Strongly Oppose · estimate Inferred from partyPratt's campaign platform emphasizes pro-growth economics, reducing government burdens, and supporting small businesses and investment, strongly implying opposition to corporate tax increases; no direct statement on the 21%-to-28% rate change is found, so this is a party-informed inference consistent with his stated economic philosophy. Fact-check this → ◇
Voting Rights
1 position · all inferred from partyWould you support federal legislation requiring all states to automatically register eligible citizens to vote when they interact with government agencies?
Inferred from partyNo direct statement on automatic voter registration found in campaign materials; inferred from Republican party opposition to federal automatic voter registration mandates and Pratt's emphasis on program integrity, accountability, and state autonomy in administering federal rules.