🗳 2026 MIDTERM GENERAL ELECTION — NOVEMBER 3

← All Races
AK
DEMOCRAT

Anthony Kozycki

Georgia House District 7 2026 · 2026

16
Policy Positions
16 of 16
Inferred from party
47%
Avg Confidence
9
Issue Areas
Find Your Alignment →

Policy Positions

●

Economy

2 positions · all inferred from party

Would you support raising the federal minimum wage to $17 per hour?

Support · estimate
Inferred from partyKozycki's campaign platform emphasizes making work pay again and restoring middle-class affordability but does not specifically mention a $17 federal minimum wage; position inferred from Democratic Party alignment and strong working-family economic rhetoric. Fact-check this →

Do you support using tariffs as a tool to address trade imbalances with other countries?

Oppose · estimate
Inferred from partyKozycki's campaign website does not address tariffs or trade policy directly; as a Democrat running in 2025-26, his party generally opposes broad tariff use as a trade-imbalance tool, informing this party-based inference.
■

Education

1 position · all inferred from party

Would you support canceling up to $50,000 in federal student loan debt per borrower?

Support · estimate
Inferred from partyThe campaign website does not address student loan cancellation directly; position is inferred from Kozycki's Democratic Party affiliation, which broadly supports some level of student debt relief, and his general affordability/middle-class focus.
◆

Environment

2 positions · all inferred from party

Do you support legislation to reduce US carbon emissions by 50% from 2005 levels by 2035?

Support · estimate
Inferred from partyKozycki's campaign website does not address carbon emissions targets or climate policy specifically; position inferred from Democratic Party alignment, which broadly supports ambitious emissions reduction legislation.

Do you support stopping the issuance of new federal permits for oil and gas drilling on public lands and offshore waters?

Support · estimate
Inferred from partyThe campaign website does not address federal drilling permits on public lands or offshore waters; position is inferred from Democratic Party norms, which generally favor restricting new fossil fuel permits, with modest support rather than strong advocacy.
▽

Foreign Policy

2 positions · all inferred from party

Would you support maintaining or increasing current levels of US foreign assistance to allied and developing nations?

Support · estimate
Inferred from partyThe campaign website mentions rebuilding trust with allies and restoring America's credibility abroad, but does not directly address foreign assistance levels; score inferred primarily from Democratic Party norms with slight upward weight from the candidate's pro-alliance rhetoric. Fact-check this →

Would you support increasing the federal defense budget by more than 5% per year above the rate of inflation?

Oppose · estimate
Inferred from partyThe campaign website makes no mention of defense spending levels; as a Democratic candidate who emphasizes domestic affordability and government accountability, party-based inference suggests opposition to large defense budget increases above inflation, though his combat veteran background introduces some uncertainty.
□

Gun Policy

2 positions · all inferred from party

Would you support requiring background checks for all firearm purchases in the US, including private sales and gun show transactions?

Support · estimate
Inferred from partyKozycki's campaign website does not address gun policy or background checks; position is inferred from his Democratic Party affiliation, which broadly supports universal background checks, with moderate confidence given no direct evidence.

Would you support a federal ban on the manufacture and sale of semi-automatic rifles with detachable magazines to civilian buyers?

Support · estimate
Inferred from partyKozycki's campaign website does not address semi-automatic rifle bans or gun policy specifically; position is inferred from Democratic Party norms, which generally favor such restrictions, with low confidence due to absence of direct evidence.
♥

Healthcare

2 positions · all inferred from party

Would you support expanding Medicare to cover all Americans regardless of age?

Support · estimate
Inferred from partyKozycki's campaign platform criticizes McCormick for letting premiums double and pledges to 'lower costs, protect your coverage, and hold the insurance industry accountable,' but makes no explicit mention of Medicare for All or expanding Medicare to all ages; position inferred from Democratic Party alignment and progressive healthcare rhetoric. Fact-check this →

Do you support federal legislation allowing Medicare to negotiate prescription drug prices with pharmaceutical manufacturers?

Support · estimate
Inferred from partyKozycki's campaign website calls for fixing the healthcare system and lowering costs but does not explicitly mention Medicare drug price negotiation; position inferred from his general healthcare cost-reduction platform and Democratic Party alignment on this issue. Fact-check this →
▶

Immigration

2 positions · all inferred from party

Would you support a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants who have lived and worked continuously in the US for more than 5 years?

Support · estimate
Inferred from partyThe campaign website does not address immigration or a pathway to citizenship; position is inferred from Democratic Party norms, which generally support earned legalization pathways for long-term undocumented residents.

Would you support significantly increasing federal funding for border security infrastructure and personnel at the US southern border?

Oppose · estimate
Inferred from partyKozycki's campaign website does not address border security or immigration, so this score is inferred from typical Democratic Party positioning, which generally opposes large increases in border security infrastructure and personnel spending without paired immigration reform.
⚑

Taxes

2 positions · all inferred from party

Would you support raising the top federal income tax rate to 50% for individual income exceeding $10 million per year?

Support · estimate
Inferred from partyKozycki's campaign website emphasizes restoring fairness, taxing the wealthy, and addressing inequality but does not specifically address a 50% top marginal rate on income over $10 million; position inferred from Democratic Party alignment and his platform's explicit focus on economic fairness and reducing the wealth gap. Fact-check this →

Would you support raising the federal corporate income tax rate from 21% to 28%?

Support · estimate
Inferred from partyNo direct statement on corporate tax rates found on Kozycki's campaign website; position inferred from Democratic Party alignment and his campaign's consistent focus on economic fairness, reducing corporate power, and rebuilding the middle class.
◇

Voting Rights

1 position · all inferred from party

Would you support federal legislation requiring all states to automatically register eligible citizens to vote when they interact with government agencies?

Support · estimate
Inferred from partyKozycki's campaign website does not address automatic voter registration directly; position inferred from Democratic Party alignment, which broadly supports automatic voter registration and expanded voting access.
Positions are AI-extracted from public sources and bias-audited by GroundedVote. Evidence types: Voting Record (highest confidence) → Party Inference (lowest). All data © 2025 The Founded Project LLC.