●
Economy
2 positions · all inferred from partyWould you support imposing tariffs of 25% or more on imports from countries that do not meet US labor and environmental standards?
Inferred from partyTafoya's campaign platform supports American energy and workers and opposes trade policies that 'sell out' American workers, but makes no specific mention of tariffs tied to labor or environmental standards, so her position is inferred from general Republican party alignment, which is mixed on this specific framing. Fact-check this → Would you support raising the federal minimum wage to $17 per hour?
Strongly Oppose · estimate Inferred from partyTafoya's campaign platform does not address the federal minimum wage directly, but her strong emphasis on cutting taxes, reducing government intervention, and fighting 'runaway spending' aligns with the Republican party's typical opposition to raising the federal minimum wage; position inferred from party and general platform ideology.
◆
Environment
2 positions · 1 inferred from partyWould you support ending new federal permits for oil and gas drilling on public lands and offshore waters?
Campaign PlatformTafoya's campaign platform explicitly calls for 'all-of-the-above' U.S. energy production including sources 'that don't stop when the sun sets or the wind stops blowing,' strongly implying opposition to restricting oil and gas drilling permits; combined with standard Republican party inference on energy permitting. Fact-check this → Would you support legislation requiring the US to reduce carbon emissions by 50% below 2005 levels by 2035?
Strongly Oppose · estimate Inferred from partyTafoya's campaign platform explicitly supports 'all-of-the-above' energy including sources that 'don't stop when the sun sets or the wind stops blowing,' opposing the left's 'war against' conventional energy, strongly implying opposition to aggressive emissions-reduction mandates; position inferred from campaign platform framing rather than a direct statement on this specific legislation. Fact-check this → ▽
Foreign Policy
2 positions · all inferred from partyWould you support increasing the federal defense budget by more than 5% per year above the rate of inflation?
Inferred from partyTafoya's campaign website does not address defense spending specifically, so this score is inferred from her Republican affiliation and strong national security, law-and-order, and border enforcement positions, which are consistent with the GOP's general support for increased defense budgets.
Would you support maintaining or increasing current levels of US foreign assistance to allied and developing nations?
Inferred from partyTafoya's campaign website does not address foreign assistance; as a Republican running on fiscal restraint, anti-fraud, and America-first themes, party inference suggests opposition to maintaining or increasing foreign aid levels.
□
Gun Policy
2 positions · all inferred from partyWould you support requiring background checks for all firearm purchases in the US, including private sales and gun show transactions?
Inferred from partyTafoya's campaign website does not address universal background checks directly, but her strong law-and-order, pro-Second Amendment Republican positioning and party affiliation suggest opposition; confidence is limited to party-based inference.
Do you support a federal policy prohibiting the manufacture and sale of semi-automatic rifles with detachable magazines to civilians?
Strongly Oppose · estimate Inferred from partyTafoya's campaign website does not address semi-automatic rifle bans specifically, but as a Republican candidate emphasizing law and order, Second Amendment culture, and opposition to far-left policies, party-based inference strongly suggests opposition to such a prohibition.
♥
Healthcare
2 positions · all inferred from partyWould you support expanding Medicare to cover all Americans regardless of age?
Strongly Oppose · estimate Inferred from partyTafoya's campaign platform opposes government-run healthcare, warning against 'faceless government bureaucrats' controlling healthcare decisions, strongly implying opposition to Medicare-for-All expansion; no direct statement on Medicare expansion specifically, so position is inferred from platform rhetoric and Republican party alignment. Fact-check this → Would you support federal legislation requiring Medicare to negotiate prescription drug prices directly with pharmaceutical manufacturers?
Inferred from partyTafoya's campaign platform mentions fighting 'price-gougers' and cutting prescription drug costs but does not specifically address Medicare negotiation; as a Republican candidate, her party generally opposes government-mandated price negotiation with pharmaceutical manufacturers, supporting a score of Oppose with low-moderate confidence based on party inference tempered by her populist anti-middleman rhetoric. Fact-check this → ⚑
Taxes
2 positions · all inferred from partyWould you support raising the top federal income tax rate to 50% for individual income exceeding $10 million per year?
Strongly Oppose · estimate Inferred from partyTafoya's campaign platform explicitly opposes tax increases on the middle class and calls for spending less and taxing less, and as a Republican candidate she aligns with strong party opposition to raising top marginal income tax rates; no direct statement on a 50% top rate exists in the available record. Fact-check this → Would you support raising the federal corporate income tax rate from 21% to 28%?
Strongly Oppose · estimate Inferred from partyTafoya's campaign platform explicitly opposes tax increases on the middle class and calls for spending less, borrowing less, and taxing less, though it does not specifically address corporate tax rates; her position is inferred from these anti-tax stances and standard Republican Party opposition to raising the corporate rate from 21% to 28%. Fact-check this →