🗳 2026 MIDTERM GENERAL ELECTION — NOVEMBER 3

← All Races
Michael Lawler
RepublicanINCUMBENT

Michael Lawler

New York House District 17 2026 · 2026

16
Policy Positions
16 of 16
Inferred from party
50%
Avg Confidence
9
Issue Areas
Find Your Alignment →

Record vs. Rhetoric

We have no public statement or campaign position from Michael Lawler on these questions yet, so there is nothing to check against how they voted.

Policy Positions

●

Economy

2 positions · all inferred from party

Would you support raising the federal minimum wage to $17 per hour?

Oppose · estimate
Inferred from partyNo direct evidence on minimum wage exists in the provided legislative record; position is inferred from his Republican party affiliation and general conservative economic stance, though Lawler represents a competitive moderate district.

Would you support imposing tariffs of 25% or more on imports from countries that do not meet US labor and environmental standards?

Neutral · estimate
Inferred from partyLawler's recent legislative record contains no direct evidence on tariff policy tied to labor/environmental standards; he is a moderate Republican from a competitive district, making party-line inference unreliable, so a neutral position is assigned with low confidence.
■

Education

1 position · all inferred from party

Would you support canceling up to $50,000 in federal student loan debt per borrower?

Oppose · estimate
Inferred from partyNo sponsored legislation directly addresses student loan cancellation; position inferred from Republican Party platform opposition to broad student debt forgiveness and Lawler's general fiscal conservatism as a House Republican. Fact-check this →
◆

Environment

2 positions · all inferred from party

Do you support legislation to reduce US carbon emissions by 50% from 2005 levels by 2035?

Oppose · estimate
Inferred from partyLawler's legislative record shows no direct evidence on carbon emission targets, but his sponsored bill extending North Atlantic right whale regulations and 'National Extreme Heat Awareness Week' support suggest some environmental awareness, while his Republican affiliation and overall record indicate likely opposition to aggressive 50% emission reduction mandates; position inferred from general policy stance.

Do you support stopping the issuance of new federal permits for oil and gas drilling on public lands and offshore waters?

Oppose · estimate
Inferred from partyLawler's record shows no direct statements on oil/gas drilling permits, but his Republican affiliation, support for extending North Atlantic right whale regulations (suggesting some environmental flexibility), and general moderate-Republican profile suggest he would oppose a full ban on new federal drilling permits while potentially supporting some environmental measures; position inferred from general policy stance.
▽

Foreign Policy

2 positions · all inferred from party

Would you support increasing the federal defense budget by more than 5% per year above the rate of inflation?

Support · estimate
Inferred from partyLawler's cosponsorship of veterans and military-related legislation (Rx ACCESS Act, Coordinating Care for Senior Veterans Act) suggests general pro-defense orientation, but no direct evidence addresses specific defense budget growth rates; position inferred from Republican affiliation and moderate pro-defense legislative record. Fact-check this →

Would you support maintaining or increasing current levels of US foreign assistance to allied and developing nations?

Neutral · estimate
Inferred from partyLawler's legislative record shows no direct bills or cosponsored legislation specifically addressing U.S. foreign assistance levels; the 'Healthy Mothers, Healthy Babies Act of 2026' touches international affairs but does not clearly indicate a position on broader foreign aid funding, so position is inferred largely from his moderate Republican profile in a competitive swing district.
□

Gun Policy

2 positions · all inferred from party

Would you support requiring background checks for all firearm purchases in the US, including private sales and gun show transactions?

Oppose · estimate
Inferred from partyNo direct evidence in the provided legislative record addresses universal background checks; position inferred from Republican Party alignment and general conservative gun rights stance typical of NY-17 Republicans, though Lawler represents a competitive swing district which may moderate his position slightly.

Would you support a federal ban on the manufacture and sale of semi-automatic rifles with detachable magazines to civilian buyers?

Oppose · estimate
Inferred from partyNo direct votes or statements on an assault weapons ban are present in the provided record; as a Republican representing a competitive NY district, Lawler has generally avoided strong gun control positions, though his moderate district profile suggests opposition rather than strong opposition to such a ban.
♥

Healthcare

2 positions · all inferred from party

Would you support expanding Medicare to cover all Americans regardless of age?

Oppose · estimate
Inferred from partyLawler's sponsored legislation includes the 'Energy Affordability and Reliability Act of 2026' and 'Early Access to Screening Act,' reflecting incremental rather than systemic healthcare reform; no direct statement on Medicare-for-All exists, but his Republican affiliation and legislative record suggest opposition to large government expansions of coverage. Fact-check this →

Would you support federal legislation requiring Medicare to negotiate prescription drug prices directly with pharmaceutical manufacturers?

Oppose · estimate
Inferred from partyNo direct evidence in the legislative record addresses Medicare drug price negotiation; position inferred from Republican party affiliation and general opposition among GOP members to the Inflation Reduction Act's negotiation provisions, though Lawler represents a competitive district and has shown moderate tendencies.
▶

Immigration

2 positions · all inferred from party

Would you support a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants who have lived and worked continuously in the US for more than 5 years?

Oppose · estimate
Inferred from partyNo direct evidence on this specific immigration question appears in the provided legislative record; position inferred from Republican party affiliation and general congressional Republican opposition to broad legalization pathways, though Lawler represents a competitive swing district (NY-17) and has occasionally broken with party on moderate issues.

Would you support significantly increasing federal funding for border security infrastructure and personnel at the US southern border?

Support · estimate
Inferred from partyLawler's sponsored and cosponsored legislation does not directly address border security, but as a Republican representing a competitive NY swing district he has generally supported border security measures; position inferred from party affiliation and general policy posture with no direct legislation on this topic in the record provided.
⚑

Taxes

2 positions · all inferred from party

Would you support raising the top federal income tax rate to 50% for individual income exceeding $10 million per year?

Strongly Oppose · estimate
Inferred from partyNo direct evidence on this specific tax proposal exists in the provided record; as a House Republican, Lawler's sponsored legislation (e.g., 'Fuel the Force Act') and party affiliation strongly suggest opposition to significant top-rate income tax increases, though his moderate NY-17 district profile prevents a score of strong oppose with high confidence.

Would you support raising the federal corporate income tax rate from 21% to 28%?

Oppose · estimate
Inferred from partyNo direct evidence on corporate tax rates in Lawler's legislative record; as a House Republican who cosponsored the 'Fuel the Force Act' (a tax-related bill) and represents a competitive NY district with a moderate-to-conservative fiscal record, he is inferred to oppose raising corporate taxes, though his moderate district positioning prevents a 'strongly oppose' rating.
◇

Voting Rights

1 position · all inferred from party

Would you support federal legislation requiring all states to automatically register eligible citizens to vote when they interact with government agencies?

Oppose · estimate
Inferred from partyNo direct evidence in Lawler's sponsored or cosponsored legislation addresses automatic voter registration; position inferred from Republican party alignment and general moderate-conservative profile, with no active championing or opposition found in the record provided.
Positions are AI-extracted from public sources and bias-audited by GroundedVote. Evidence types: Voting Record (highest confidence) → Party Inference (lowest). All data © 2025 The Founded Project LLC.