DemocratINCUMBENT

Adam Gray

California House District 13 2026 · 2026

Policy Positions

45%

Avg Confidence

Issue Areas

Find Your Alignment →

Record vs. Rhetoric

100%

Of Adam Gray's stated positions that could be checked against their congressional legislative record, 1 of 1 held up as consistent. 2 had too little legislative evidence to judge either way.

Comparison of stated positions with bills they sponsored and cosponsored (Congress.gov), assessed by AI and shown with its working. Draw your own conclusion.

Other1 consistent · 0 inconsistent · 2 unclear

·Mixed record: sponsors environmental bills but also ESA exemption expansion; no clear emissions target stance. Fact-check this →

✓Stop Raising Prices on Food Act opposes food tariffs, consistent with skepticism toward tariffs. Fact-check this →

·Pro-development indicators suggest opposition, but no direct legislation on oil and gas permits found. Fact-check this →

Policy Positions

●

Economy

2 positions

Would you support raising the federal minimum wage to $17 per hour?

Neutral

Party InferenceNo sponsored legislation or direct statements related to minimum wage were found in the available record; position cannot be determined beyond party-based inference. Fact-check this →

Do you support using tariffs as a tool to address trade imbalances with other countries?

Oppose

Campaign PlatformGray sponsored the 'Stop Raising Prices on Food Act,' which suggests opposition to tariffs that raise consumer food prices, indicating skepticism toward tariffs as a trade tool, though his broader tariff stance is not explicitly documented. Fact-check this →

■

Education

1 position

Would you support canceling up to $50,000 in federal student loan debt per borrower?

Neutral

Party InferenceAdam Gray's sponsored legislation focuses on water resources, environmental policy, food prices, and national security, with no direct evidence of his position on federal student loan cancellation. Fact-check this →

◆

Environment

3 positions

Would you support legislation to reduce US carbon emissions by 50% by 2035?

Neutral

Campaign PlatformGray has sponsored both environmental legislation (Build Now Act) and a bill to expand ESA exemptions for economic impacts, suggesting a centrist or mixed environmental record that does not clearly indicate support or opposition to a specific 50% emissions reduction target by 2035. Fact-check this →

Would you support legislation requiring the US to reduce carbon emissions by 50% below 2005 levels by 2035?

Oppose

Party InferenceGray's sponsored legislation includes an amendment to weaken the Endangered Species Act for economic impacts and national security exemptions, alongside water and food price bills suggesting a moderate-to-conservative Democrat posture on environmental regulation; his record does not indicate support for aggressive emissions reduction targets, though no direct statement on this specific question was found. Fact-check this →

Would you support ending new federal permits for oil and gas drilling on public lands and offshore waters?

Oppose

Campaign PlatformGray represents a Central Valley district with significant agricultural and energy interests, and his sponsored legislation includes amendments to weaken Endangered Species Act protections and water resource development bills, suggesting a pro-development, moderate Democratic stance that would likely oppose ending new federal oil and gas permits; no direct statement on this specific issue was found. Fact-check this →

▽

Foreign Policy

3 positions

Would you support increasing the federal defense budget by more than 5% annually?

Neutral

Party InferenceThe STRIVE Act of 2025 indicates some engagement with national security issues, but there is insufficient direct evidence in Gray's legislative record to determine his position on increasing the federal defense budget by more than 5% annually. Fact-check this →

Would you support increasing the federal defense budget by more than 5% per year above the rate of inflation?

Neutral

Party InferenceGray sponsored the STRIVE Act of 2025 (Armed Forces and National Security), suggesting some defense engagement, but no direct evidence addresses a specific threshold of 5%+ annual real defense budget increases; position is inferred with low confidence. Fact-check this →

Would you support maintaining or increasing current levels of US foreign assistance to allied and developing nations?

Neutral

Party InferenceNo direct evidence from Gray's sponsored legislation or public record addresses U.S. foreign assistance; his legislative focus is on domestic water resources, environmental policy, and agriculture, providing insufficient basis for a clear position on foreign aid. Fact-check this →

□

Gun Policy

3 positions

Would you support universal background checks for all firearm purchases in the US?

Neutral

Party InferenceAdam Gray's recently sponsored legislation does not address gun policy, and no direct statements or voting record on universal background checks are evident from the provided record. Fact-check this →

Do you support a federal policy prohibiting the manufacture and sale of semi-automatic rifles with detachable magazines to civilians?

Oppose

Party InferenceAdam Gray is a conservative Democrat from California's Central Valley who has not sponsored any gun control legislation; his record suggests a moderate-to-conservative stance on gun issues typical of rural/agricultural district Democrats, but no direct evidence on this specific policy was found. Fact-check this →

Would you support requiring background checks for all firearm purchases in the US, including private sales and gun show transactions?

Support

Party InferenceNo direct evidence on universal background checks found in Gray's recent legislative record; position inferred from his Democratic affiliation and moderate-to-progressive Central Valley district profile, though his record shows significant focus on agriculture/water/economic issues rather than gun policy. Fact-check this →

♥

Healthcare

2 positions

Would you support expanding Medicare to cover all Americans regardless of age?

Neutral

Party InferenceGray's sponsored legislation focuses on water resources, environmental policy, and food costs, with no direct evidence of his position on Medicare-for-All or expanding Medicare to all ages. Fact-check this →

Do you support federal legislation allowing Medicare to negotiate prescription drug prices with pharmaceutical manufacturers?

Support

Party InferenceGray's sponsored legislation includes the 'Protecting Health Care and Lowering Costs Act of 2025,' which suggests support for healthcare cost-reduction measures, but no direct evidence specifically addresses Medicare drug price negotiation; position inferred from this related legislation and general Democratic alignment as a moderate Democrat. Fact-check this →

▶

Immigration

3 positions

Would you support a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants who have lived in the US for more than 5 years?

Neutral

Party InferenceNone of Gray's recently sponsored legislation directly addresses a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, and no public statements or voting record on this specific issue are available in the provided record. Fact-check this →

Would you support significantly increasing federal funding for border security infrastructure and personnel at the US southern border?

Support

Party InferenceGray's sponsored legislation includes the STRIVE Act of 2025 (Armed Forces and National Security) and he represents a competitive Central Valley district, suggesting a moderate-to-supportive stance on border security, though no legislation directly addresses southern border infrastructure funding; position inferred from legislative profile and district context. Fact-check this →

Would you support a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants who have lived and worked continuously in the US for more than 5 years?

Support

Party InferenceNo direct evidence found in Gray's recent legislative record on immigration pathways; he is a moderate Democrat from a competitive Central Valley district, and his sponsored legislation focuses on water, environment, and economic issues, suggesting a pragmatic moderate stance that likely leans supportive of earned citizenship without being a champion of the issue. Fact-check this →

⚑

Taxes

3 positions

Would you support increasing the top marginal income tax rate to 50% for income over $10 million?

Neutral

Party InferenceGray's sponsored legislation (Protecting Health Care and Lowering Costs Act of 2025) touches on taxation but provides no direct evidence of his position on a 50% top marginal income tax rate for high earners. Fact-check this →

Would you support raising the top federal income tax rate to 50% for individual income exceeding $10 million per year?

Neutral

Party InferenceGray's sponsored 'Protecting Health Care and Lowering Costs Act of 2025' touches taxation but does not directly address top marginal income tax rates; as a moderate Democrat from a competitive Central Valley district, his position on a 50% top rate exceeding $10M is not clearly established from available records. Fact-check this →

Would you support raising the federal corporate income tax rate from 21% to 28%?

Neutral

Party InferenceGray's sponsored legislation (including the 'Protecting Health Care and Lowering Costs Act of 2025') touches on taxation but does not directly address corporate tax rates; as a moderate Democrat representing a competitive Central Valley district, his position on raising the corporate rate to 28% is not clearly established from available records. Fact-check this →

◇

Voting Rights

1 position

Would you support federal legislation requiring all states to automatically register eligible citizens to vote when they interact with government agencies?

Support

Party InferenceNo direct evidence found on automatic voter registration in Gray's sponsored legislation or public record; position inferred from his Democratic affiliation and moderate-to-progressive legislative profile, though his Central Valley district and pragmatic legislative focus suggest he is a moderate Democrat rather than a strong champion of this issue. Fact-check this →