RepublicanINCUMBENT

Juan Ciscomani

Arizona House District 6 2026 · 2026

Policy Positions

52%

Avg Confidence

Issue Areas

Find Your Alignment →

Record vs. Rhetoric

100%

Of Juan Ciscomani's stated positions that could be checked against their congressional legislative record, 1 of 1 held up as consistent.

Comparison of stated positions with bills they sponsored and cosponsored (Congress.gov), assessed by AI and shown with its working. Draw your own conclusion.

Other1 consistent · 0 inconsistent

✓Shadow Wolves Improvement Act directly supports border security personnel, consistent with strong border security stance. Fact-check this →

Policy Positions

●

Economy

2 positions

Would you support imposing tariffs of 25% or more on imports from countries that do not meet US labor and environmental standards?

Neutral

Party InferenceCiscomani's sponsored legislation focuses on housing, veterans, public lands, and immigration enforcement, with no clear evidence of a position on tariffs tied to labor or environmental standards, requiring party-based inference as the primary signal. Fact-check this →

Would you support raising the federal minimum wage to $17 per hour?

Oppose

Party InferenceNo direct evidence on minimum wage in Ciscomani's legislative record; position inferred from his Republican affiliation, general conservative economic stance, and sponsorship of fiscally conservative legislation, with Republicans broadly opposing federal minimum wage increases. Fact-check this →

◆

Environment

2 positions

Do you support legislation to reduce US carbon emissions by 50% from 2005 levels by 2035?

Oppose

Party InferenceNo direct evidence found in Ciscomani's sponsored legislation regarding carbon emissions targets; position inferred from his Republican party affiliation, general conservative voting record in a competitive district, and absence of any climate-focused legislation in his recent record. Fact-check this →

Do you support stopping the issuance of new federal permits for oil and gas drilling on public lands and offshore waters?

Oppose

Party InferenceCiscomani's sponsored legislation does not directly address oil and gas permitting, but as a Republican representing a competitive Arizona district, his general legislative profile and party alignment suggest opposition to halting new federal energy permits, inferred from overall policy stance. Fact-check this →

▽

Foreign Policy

2 positions

Would you support increasing the federal defense budget by more than 5% per year above the rate of inflation?

Support

Party InferenceCiscomani's sponsored legislation includes multiple defense and veterans bills (Vets CLEAR Act, Pay Our Homeland Defenders Act, Veterans Economic Opportunity and Transition Administration Act), suggesting general support for defense spending, but no direct evidence exists on this specific question of increasing the defense budget above 5% per year above inflation. Fact-check this →

Would you support maintaining or increasing current levels of US foreign assistance to allied and developing nations?

Oppose

Party InferenceNo direct evidence in Ciscomani's sponsored legislation addresses foreign assistance; position is inferred from Republican Party alignment and general conservative skepticism toward foreign aid spending, with low confidence due to lack of direct evidence. Fact-check this →

□

Gun Policy

2 positions

Would you support requiring background checks for all firearm purchases in the US, including private sales and gun show transactions?

Oppose

Party InferenceNo direct evidence in Ciscomani's sponsored legislation addresses universal background checks; position inferred from his Republican affiliation, conservative district, and general pro-Second Amendment stance typical of Arizona GOP representatives, with no record of supporting expanded background check legislation. Fact-check this →

Do you support a federal policy prohibiting the manufacture and sale of semi-automatic rifles with detachable magazines to civilians?

Strongly Oppose

Party InferenceCiscomani is a Republican representing a competitive Arizona district with no direct statements or votes on semi-automatic rifle bans found in the provided record; position inferred from party affiliation and general Republican opposition to such restrictions, with moderate confidence due to lack of direct evidence. Fact-check this →

♥

Healthcare

2 positions

Would you support expanding Medicare to cover all Americans regardless of age?

Oppose

Party InferenceNo direct evidence on Medicare expansion exists in Ciscomani's sponsored legislation record; position inferred from his Republican affiliation and general conservative policy alignment, with his sponsored bills reflecting priorities in veterans' services, housing, and border security rather than healthcare expansion. Fact-check this →

Would you support federal legislation requiring Medicare to negotiate prescription drug prices directly with pharmaceutical manufacturers?

Oppose

Party InferenceNo direct evidence on Medicare drug price negotiation found in Ciscomani's sponsored legislation; position inferred from his Republican affiliation and generally conservative voting record, as Republicans have broadly opposed mandatory Medicare drug price negotiation provisions like those in the Inflation Reduction Act. Fact-check this →

▶

Immigration

2 positions

Would you support a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants who have lived and worked continuously in the US for more than 5 years?

Oppose

Party InferenceCiscomani's sponsored legislation includes the Shadow Wolves Improvement Act (border enforcement-focused) and he is a House Republican representing a border district; no direct evidence of support for a citizenship pathway, and his record suggests a border-security-first orientation, though he has not been a vocal champion of opposing legalization explicitly. Fact-check this →

Would you support significantly increasing federal funding for border security infrastructure and personnel at the US southern border?

Strongly Support

Public StatementCiscomani sponsored the Shadow Wolves Improvement Act (related to border security personnel) and represents a competitive southern Arizona district bordering Mexico; as a House Republican he has consistently aligned with strong border security positions, though direct statements on federal funding levels for border infrastructure are inferred rather than explicitly documented here. Fact-check this →

⚑

Taxes

2 positions

Would you support raising the top federal income tax rate to 50% for individual income exceeding $10 million per year?

Strongly Oppose

Party InferenceNo direct evidence on this specific tax question exists in the provided record; position inferred from Ciscomani's Republican party affiliation and general conservative legislative profile, which strongly aligns with opposition to high marginal tax rates. Fact-check this →

Would you support raising the federal corporate income tax rate from 21% to 28%?

Strongly Oppose

Party InferenceNo direct statement or vote on corporate tax rates found in Ciscomani's record; position inferred from his Republican affiliation, general support for lower taxes (Pay Our Homeland Defenders Act suggests fiscal conservatism), and the strong Republican consensus against raising corporate taxes from the 2017 TCJA level of 21%. Fact-check this →

◇

Voting Rights

1 position

Would you support federal legislation requiring all states to automatically register eligible citizens to vote when they interact with government agencies?

Oppose

Party InferenceNo direct evidence on automatic voter registration found in Ciscomani's sponsored legislation; position inferred from his Republican party affiliation and general conservative voting record, as Republicans have broadly opposed federal automatic voter registration mandates. Fact-check this →